<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trustworthy.net &#187; MIS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trustworthy.net/blog/category/mis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trustworthy.net/blog</link>
	<description>Advocating software you can trust.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 01:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Pseudo OpenXML to the Open Document Format</title>
		<link>http://trustworthy.net/blog/2007/02/word-processor-review-at-donationcodercom/</link>
		<comments>http://trustworthy.net/blog/2007/02/word-processor-review-at-donationcodercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLOSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeSoftware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LibreSoftware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OfficeSoftware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenFormat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SchoolTools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustworthy.net/blog/2007/02/word-processor-review-at-donationcodercom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone: I just came across the following paragraph in a review of word processors I felt was pretty compelling: &#8220;Let us be clear: the choice is not between being able to interoperate with Microsoftâ€” thanks to Novell and Corel doing interoperability work for them â€” or being stuck in some ODF ghetto, unable to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone: I just came across the following paragraph in a <a href="http://www.donationcoder.com/Reviews/Archive/WordProcs/">review of word processors</a> I felt was pretty compelling:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Let us be clear: the choice is not between being able to interoperate with Microsoftâ€” thanks to Novell and Corel doing interoperability work for them â€” or being stuck in some ODF ghetto, unable to read Microsoft documents. Everyone wants to interoperate. The question is how. The problem is Microsoft. The solution lies with Microsoft. It&#8217;s 2007, and it&#8217;s time that Microsoft followed the same standards everyone else, instead of insisting the world bend to their ways. Microsoft&#8217;s OXML doesn&#8217;t disrupt <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2007011720521698">this propensity</a>. It&#8217;s not only unacceptable, but quite strange that even <em>now</em> we can&#8217;t all freely share documents with one another, no matter what operating system we like to use. We can send each other email, read each others&#8217; blogs and websites, even if you are on Windows, I&#8217;m on Linux, and Uncle Fester is using OS X. Why isn&#8217;t that the norm for everything? It ought to be. The bottleneck is Microsoft. FOSS software is happy to interoperate with any other software. Why won&#8217;t Microsoft? That is the $64,000 question in 2007. All this only matters if you intend to use Microsoft Word. The good news is that there are many good alternatives&#8221; (<a href="http://www.donationcoder.com/Reviews/Archive/WordProcs/">DonationCoder.com, 2007.02.16</a>).</li>
</ul>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://trustworthy.net/blog/2007/02/word-processor-review-at-donationcodercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

